A little bit of PSH

In Seattle Post-Intelligencer, which actually had some coverage of National Ammo Day.

The thought of Monday as National Ammo Day, a period dedicated to buying bullets to support the Second Amendment, might send shivers down the backs of some Seattle residents.

Why?  Honestly, someone is going to have to explain this fear of inanimate objects to me, because I still have yet to “get it”.  I’ve been doing this pro-gun thing for a while now, and that is the one thing I still have yet to fully understand about the opposite side of the aisle.

Of course, it wouldn’t be an SPI article if they didn’t slip something completely idiotic into their writing.

To mark it, Taff plans to buy 100 rounds and fire them at a Bellevue range.

While Monday marks the sixth annual National Ammo Day, Taff heard about it only recently.

He was not concerned that criminals would use the day to clear ammunition shelves and then commit robberies.

…sometimes, there are no words.  Really?  National Ammo Day is used by criminals to clear shelves?  Doesn’t that seem like you’re reaching a little bit there?  It’s almost like they’re trying to find ways to generate hysterics about the most benign of topics…wait, nevermind, that’s exactly what they’re doing.

Range retards

Sebastian calls them “range assholes“, which is also perfectly fine.  Reading over the actual story at Bitter’s, she’s talking about an NRA Firearms instructor that demonstrated all the traits necessary to make sure that someone never picks up a gun again.

I really hate it when I go to the range and I see someone like that – and Bitter is right, it’s even more troubling when it’s someone who is supposed to be a trained, certified ambassador for the sport.

I’ll echo Sebastian’s sentiments here – if you’ve ever had a bad experience with an alleged “shooting instructor”, and you’d like to erase that ugly memory, let one of us know.

Warrant? We don’t need no stinkin’ warrant!

At least that’s what the Boston Police think, now that their instituting their new “gun search” program.

Boston police are launching a program that will call upon parents in high-crime neighborhoods to allow detectives into their homes, without a warrant, to search for guns in their children’s bedrooms.

Man, I could have sworn that there was something in that pesky Constitution about crap like this…if only there was an amendment…something that said that people shall be secure and safe from unwarranted searches and seizures.

All kidding aside, the issue here is what’s called “informed consent”.  A spokesperson from the ACLU explains it pretty well in the article:

Critics said they worry that some residents will be too intimidated by a police presence on their doorstep to say no to a search.

“Our biggest concern is the notion of informed consent,” said Amy Reichbach, a racial justice advocate at the American Civil Liberties Union. “People might not understand the implications of weapons being tested or any contraband being found.”

Which is pretty much why I have a problem with this.  Since there isn’t a search warrant, there is no limit on the scope of what can and can’t be used as evidence.  You let the cops into your house based on consent, and EVERYTHING is free game for them.

I want to stop youth crime as much as anyone else in the country, but I just don’t believe that messing with people’s civil liberties is the way to go about things.  Just because getting warrants is damned inconvenient doesn’t mean that the police should be allowed to make an end run around the Constitution.

This is one of those weird moments where the ACLU and the pro-gun faction end up side by side on an issue.  I sort of enjoy it when that happens, because it makes all sorts of headaches for your typical Starbucks Liberal.

Coincidence?

Once again, I find myself pointing back to the piece that CBS evening news ran on “assault rifles” in Broward County, Florida.  But this time, it’s not to point out anything that the media has done, but rather to cast your attention on something that an eagle-eyed reader pointed out to me.

The now ex-sheriff of Broward County has been sentenced to a year in federal prison on various corruption charges.

I am not big on conspiracy theories, but you have to admit that it is an interesting twist of fate that the “top cop” in the county that facilitated the CBS lie filled piece on assault weapons is a dirty cop.  If he was willing to cheat and embezzle from the county, what other skeletons are in his closet?

Fire Joe Tiller

I’ve been thinking about this since yesterday’s awful loss to IU, and I’ve come to an inescapable conclusion. It’s time for a regime change in West Lafayette, and Joe Tiller needs to go. It’s not because he’s a bad coach, or that we’ve been having several losing years, because we haven’t. The problem is that we’ve gotten complacent. Since the glorious Rose Bowl year, we’ve basically won 7 or 8 games every year and gone to a crappy bowl each year. The problem is that the administration seems to be pretty happy with that, and as such are not out there recruiting the kind of top flight talent Purdue needs to stay competitive in the Big Ten.

Institutional complacency is a bad thing, and we have it in spades at Purdue. I think Tiller (and his staff) are partly to blame for that, but so are the Athletic Directors for not ripping Joe Tiller a new asshole every year we haven’t been competitive in the Big Ten.

Yesterday’s game at IU is a perfect example. If you watched the game, you saw that Purdue didn’t start playing with a sense of urgency until midway through the 3rd quarter. Once we played with passion, we outscored IU 21-10; but because that passion didn’t show up until almost the fourth quarter, we lost. That’s the kind of complacency that needs to go.

I’d love to see us get some hotshot new coach in here, someone that young kids from around the country are going to want to play for. Poach an NFL Offensive Coordinator who has a rep for making good QBs and make him head coach. Purdue used to have a rep for creating excellent quarterbacks, let’s get that back.

Come on Purdue. Let’s go shopping for new coaches.

Explain to me

Why this is illegal?

Federal agents have raided sites in Idaho and Indiana linked to the “Liberty Dollar,” a silver coin used by groups that oppose the Federal Reserve System and the federal income tax, a newspaper reported.

Basically, some people that oppose the federal reserve system have been minting these “Liberty Dollar” coins on silver and gold.  Since no stores accept them and they’re not considered legal tender, I don’t really see how the fed is going to prosecute this as a crime.  Now, I’m willing to entertain explanations, because I really don’t get this one.  What exactly is illegal about me starting up a minting operation and cranking out what amounts to pretty pictures stamped on precious metals?

Good news for Hoosier Hunters

DNR says that this should be a good season for deer.  Unlike last year, they’re not having issues with parasites wiping out 30% of the deer population.

The Indiana Department of Natural Resources says deer should be abundant for the state’s firearms deer season, which begins Saturday.

I have never been deer hunting in Indiana, although every time around this year I think to myself: “Self, I should go deer hunting this year”.  But then my wife points out to me that I’m not doing it for the hunt, but rather for the challenge it presents me as a marksman.  Invariably, I never end up going hunting, for a myriad of reasons – although admittedly this year I can’t use the excuse that “I don’t have a good gun for deer”.

Best of luck to the hunters heading out this weekend – I hope you get your deer!

Big weekend

Going down to the other, lesser Indiana school to watch the Boilermakers kick the crap out of those IU pansies tomorrow.  I might take some pictures.  I’m debating which gun to bring, because I can’t actually take it to the game itself, but I don’t want to be unarmed on a long drive or in a strange hotel.   I’ll probably just take the .45 ACP Taurus.

GO BOILERS!

Anti-gun bias

In their previous issue, under the “Intelligence” section, Parade Magazine ran a brief anti-gun piece, called “Why Criminals are still getting guns”. I’ll actually copy and paste the entire thing here, because it’s really just a paragraph.

Even though crime is on the decline across the U.S., gun violence is actually on the rise. How do guns continue to end up in the hands of criminals? A small group of sellers is responsible: 57% of the guns used in crimes come from 1% of all dealers. Too often, they fail to run background checks or sell large numbers of weapons to traffickers who then resell them on the street. Due to weak laws and lack of enforcement, it can take an average of 11 years for authorities to order one shop to quit selling firearms. From 2003 to 2005, law-enforcement agencies reportedly traced an astonishing 1,424 guns used in crimes back to Trader Sports of California. The store had been investigated since the 1970s, but only last year was it forced to leave the firearms business. Progress is occurring, however. Under Mayor Michael Bloomberg, the City of New York has sued 27 dealers in five states for engaging in illegal sales; so far, 14 of them have settled and agreed to stricter monitoring of gun sales and to tough penalties.

The blurb grossly misrepresents the way trace data is actually used, as that 57% number includes firearms that were legally purchased and then later stolen.

The little paragraph also holds up Mayor Bloomberg’s “gun stings” as an example of good work, but fails to mention that Bloomberg’s operatives committed multiple felonies during the course of their investigations, and that Bloomberg received a cease-and-desist letter from the Department of Justice, because he was compromising actual criminal investigations.

Parade Magazine rarely prints letters to the editor in their print version, however they will sometimes show them in their online format. Below is a copy of the letter I sent to their editor, Janice Kaplan:

Ms. Kaplan,

Regarding the short paragraph in last week’s “Intelligence” section, entitled Why Criminals are Still Getting Guns”, I wanted to address some of the areas where the paragraph falls short.

While crime, and especially violent crime, continue to be a problem in America, your article appears to place the blame at the feet of lawful retailers of firearms. The statistic “57% of the guns used in crimes come from 1% of all dealers” is tremendously misleading, as it misrepresents the way that ATF trace data is used. That 57% number includes more than just firearms sold by the dealer directly to a criminal, it includes firearms that were sold in legal transactions, and then later stolen and used in criminal activity; it also includes firearms that may have been confiscated as evidence during suicide investiagtions.

The short paragraph also holds up Mayor Bloomberg’s “sting operations” as positive examples of “fighting illegal guns”, but fails to mention that Mayor Bloomberg’s operatives committed multiple federal felonies during their investigations, and that the Department of Justice requested that the investigations be stopped, as they were compromising actual pending criminal cases.

It’s unfortunate that Parade, a magazine I otherwise enjoy, has chosen to display an anti-gun bias so prominently. I hope that future articles will display a more rigorous attention to factual details.

Regards,

Caleb

Uncle points out that maybe if the ATF wasn’t so busy trying to shut people down for making paperwork errors, they might actually shut down the bad guys.