Question for the Board

Do you have a question that you’d like to ask to one of the people running for the board of NRA? Click over to Sebastian’s blog to fill out their form. My question was for Edie Reynolds, who is a legend on the smallbore rifle circuit. I wanted to know that if she’s elected, what she’ll do to support all the shooting sports under NRA’s banner, not just smallbore rifle.

If you look at participation in the gun games, the sports that are experiencing the most growth are the “action” type games, such as three-gun, USPSA, etc. I hope that NRA will heartily throw their weight behind supporting the action games; as evidenced by their efforts to re-vitalize NRA Action Pistol/Bianchi Cup.

Custom Gun Porn

At this link to Cylinder & Slide, there is an entire page of guns that I would commit all seven deadly sins for. All of them.

Especially this one. A 5 inch, 9mm 1911 is pretty much “The bee’s knees” for Enhanced Service Pistol division in IDPA, and knowing that the gun picture has been built/tuned by the C&S guys makes me all tingly inside.

Gun Nuts Last Night: Women and Guns

If I’ve said it once, I’ve said it a million times – if you didn’t listen to the live broadcast of last night’s show on Women and Self-Defense, then you missed out. Luckily for you, you have a lot of options to download the conversation between Breda, myself, and our main guest Pax. You can click the embedded player below to listen to the show, or you can click here to download an .mp3 copy of the show.

Again, if you missed the show, you missed out. Click here to go to the show page, or click here for instructions on how to subscribe to Gun Nuts Radio on iTunes, and automatically get our shows every week.

Pax was a great guest – it’s fascinating to me to be on the outside looking on at that kind of interaction, because I’m not a woman, and I often just don’t think about stuff from that point of view. If you’re interested in getting your wife/mother/girlfriend/sister/niece/hot chick at Starbucks into shooting, last night’s show is a must listen.

A .22 for Home Defense

I received an email the other day from a reader who asks the following:

Ahab, my wife and I just bought our first home, and are now looking to home-security and stuff like that. We have an alarm system and a dog, but because of the economy money is too tight to get a new gun just for home defense. Right now, the only gun I own is a Ruger .22 rifle. Can I use this for self defense?

The short answer is “yes”, you “can” use your 10/22 for self-defense; but a more complicated question would have been “should I?” However, because buying a 9mm or a .38 or whatever isn’t an option, I’ll solely look at utilizing the 10/22 as a defensive weapon. First off, the pros of using a Ruger 10/22 for home defense:

  • Handy and accurate – in it’s factory configuration, the Ruger 10/22 is one of the most user friendly .22 rifles out there, with the exception being the magazine release that was designed by a proctologist.
  • Easy to accessorize – for not a lot of money, you can hang a rail and a light on your gun, or even buy a stock with a built in laser.
  • Cheap to feed – the biggest benefit to a .22 is that it doesn’t cost a lot of money to shoot, which means that you can do the most essential task of any home defense weapon: Practice.  Practice a lot.  Practice until you know the gun like it’s your own arm.

As we all know though, there are some cons to using a .22 for home defense, and while this list in certainly not all-inclusive, it sums up the worst of the lot.

  • Lack of stopping power – to face facts, the .22 LR cartridge is not generally known as a fight stopper.  Yes, it has been used in defensive shootings in the past, and yes it wracked up an impressive body count, but it would not be my first choice in a gunfight.
  • Low magazine capacity – the factory mags from Ruger are limited to 10 rounds, and aftermarket magazines with higher capacities can be unreliable, which is the death-knell of a defensive firearm.
  • That damned magazine release – seriously, it’s the only thing I hate about the 10/22.  The way the mag release is set up from the factory makes “fast mag changes” an impossibility without modifying the gun.

Now, in my reader’s situation, the .22 is all he has for home defense, so unfortunately the pros and cons are what they are, and he has to deal with them.  So the question becomes “how do you mitigate the cons of the .22?”  The answer, which should come as no surprise, is training.  The greatest con of the .22 LR cartridge is that it does not produce significant terminal ballistics.  Remember Caleb’s Rules of Stopping Power?  A bullet must penetrate deep enough to hit vital organs, and while doing it must crush enough tissue to damage the body’s systems so that the aggressive actions are ceased.  The .22 has trouble with both of those categories, although to a lesser degree when used from a rifle.  My personal ammo recommendation is to use non-hollowpoint ammo in your .22 LR rifle; CCI’s 40 grain solid Mini-Mags are excellent bullets, they feed well and are moving fast, which means they’re your best bet to get that penetration necessary.  Hollow point ammo in a .22 has a tendency to mushroom early and create too shallow of a wound track to incapacitate an attacker. The advantage to the .22 then is that rapid follow up shots are easy with the 10/22 carbine, which is good because multiple shots will likely be called for.

Ultimately, the answer to your question is “yes, you can use your Ruger 10/22 for home defense.” However, if you choose to so do, it is imperative that like with any defensive firearm, you train with it. Train obsessively with your .22 – train until it’s like a piece of your own body. God forbid that the balloon should go up, but if it does you will want to know your firearm inside out and upside down. If you’re going to use a .22 for home defense, the Ruger 10/22 would be my recommendation as well, just make sure you’re well trained on your defensive weapon.

Gemtech Suppressed GSG-5

Lots of people own the incredibly popular GSG-5, the .22LR clone of an MP-5.  The factory configured gun mounts a fake suppressor, which is cool and everything, but wouldn’t it be even more awesome if you could get one with a real suppressor?  Well, now you can.  Gemtech is offering an integrally suppressed version of the GSG-5, which will retail for around $1200. There isn’t any info on Gemtech’s website, however you can read more about it at The Firearm Blog.

Speaking of cool suppressed guns, Gemtech also offers an integrally suppressed complete upper receiver for your AR patter rifle, also in .22 LR. I saw that and immediately thought it was the solution to my suburban squirrel problem.

Tonight on Gun Nuts Radio: More chicks and guns

That’s right, tonight’s Gun Nuts Radio we will be revisiting one of our all time most popular topics, women and the shooting sports.  Joining us tonight will be Pax, from The Firing Line and The Cornered Cat, as well as a couple of other guests.  We’ll be looking primarily tonight at the social issues around women carrying firearms in today’s world, how they’re treated, how other women react, and even “what to tell your mom.”

Join us live tonight at 9pm Eastern time for the fastest hour on the internet!  As usual, you’re invited to join the conversation in the chat room at www.blogtalkradio.com/gunnuts or to call in live at 347-539-5436!  See you there at 9pm!

The case against park carry

From the Brady Campaign, as interpreted by Sebastian:

Whaaa! You didn’t listen to us! Whaaah! We submitted all those comments and you dismissed them *sniffle*. National Parks are going to go from a place where children can frolick and play to a place where they are cut down by gunfire on a regular basis because these concealed weapons license holders are dangerous people *whimper*. Why doesn’t anyone listen to us anymore? We tell you the parks will run red with blood and you ignore us? We tell you that you need to prepare an EIS to tell everyone how many children a day will be cut down by the environmental menace that concealed carry clearly is, and you claim some petty exemption.

Well, no more big Mr. Meany Kempthorne! We’re going to sue you! That’s right. We’re going to MAKE you listen to us. We’ll make sure that neither you, or any future Secretary of Interior can ever ignore the needs of the children by allowing concealed weapons in National Parks, EVER. Then you’ll see we’re important! Then you’ll be sorry you didn’t listen to us!

I lol’d.  Now personally, I would love to see their suit get tossed out – getting national park carry was a big deal for a lot of our gun owning friends out west.

Over-engineering as a design solution

Going to Purdue University, a lot of my friends during the latter half of my collegiate years were engineers (in fact, I started college as an engineering major).  As engineers, they did and still do have a deep and abiding passion for building things that are “disaster-proof”, or as my roommate called it “over-engineered to the point of ridiculousness”.  You can see that same school thought is populated into the design philosophy of some firearms companies, with Ruger being the most prominent example.  Now, when I’m saying “over-engineered”, I do not mean that in the pejorative sense as it’s sometime used.  What I’m saying is when something is properly over-engineered, it extends the service life of Item X well past the failure point of Item X’s market competitors.

A great example of this is the Ruger Security Six revolver, which started life in the 70s to compete in the at-the-time service pistol market against the comparable revolvers from Colt and Smith & Wesson. Anecdotal evidence suggests that the beefed up Security Six frame could tolerate a steady diet of .357 Magnum ammo over it’s service life, while the competitor .357s from S&W and Colt would lose their timing after many fewer rounds than the Ruger revolver.

If you look at the two above images, note the comparative “beefiness” of the top strap on the Ruger Security Six (pictured at top) vs. the top strap on the S&W Model 19. While I’m not knocking the Model 19 in any way, the Ruger simply has more steel in one of the highest stress areas on a magnum revolver. The additional beefiness (new favorite word) of the Ruger makes it more resistant to erosion of the top strap due to magnum loads. The top-strap is the most visible external piece of over-engineering on the Ruger revolver, which allows it to service as an example of the overall design philosophy. If one were to detail strip the guts of the above pictured revolver, you would find that the internal timing pieces (such as the pawl and cylinder lock, etc) on the Ruger are generally larger and more robust than on contemporary revolvers.

Now, this does not mean that the Ruger is a “better” revolver. However, it’s worth pointing out that there no sections in reloading manuals labeled “Smith & Wesson only” or “Colt only”, but there are sections labeled “Ruger only”.

This week, we’re going to continue to explore different schools of thought in handgun design – we’ll also look at elegance in design, as well the point where over-engineering something takes it from a robust, good idea to the land of bad, bad ideas.