More Airsoft Hysteria

From it’s most likely location, none other than across the pond. This story is loaded with gems, and it seems that this sort of behavior has become par for the course for the Empire these days.

POLICE have today warned that anyone carrying a ball-bearing (BB) gun in public risks being killed by armed officers.

Well, that’s a bit harsh. I mean, I know it’s true, and if you point a gun (toy or otherwise) at the fuzz then you’re an idiot. The article continues, and actually mentions the Airsoft Hysteria phenomenon, albeit not by name.

a stern warning was issued to make people aware of the similarities in appearance to a real gun and the panic that can be caused. (emphasis mine)

Ah yes. Because your toys are scary looking, and the concept of a human being wanting to play with a (gasp) gun is just too shocking for the English psyche to grasp. Which of course means if calling the cops in hysterics, who respond with SWAT teams.

The Airsoft Hysteria reflects quite accurately on the “scary looking guns” hysteria in the US. People who want to ban “assault weapons” just want to ban them because of how they look. If you take that same mentality to its extreme, you end up with people going into a panic because of an Airsoft pistol.

I just don’t like a culture of fear – and that’s the end product of having hoplophobes run the show. We end up living in fear for our lives, and living in fear of whatever object we’re told to fear. By creating scary boogeymen, the gun grab (or Airsoft banners) can utilize the single most effective tool in their arsenal: fear. Fear that you children will be shot by police while playing with their toys is no different that fear that your children will be gunned down by madmen with “assault weapons”.

Playing to fear, the old gun control cry of “for the children” or “blood in the streets” is their most effective ploy – and it’s also the only ploy that they really have. I normally avoid such polarizing statements as the following, but I do firmly believe that if you support gun control, you are supporting living in fear.

Gun misnomers

Things like this in the press are dangerous, because they reinforce incorrect beliefs that are held by a lot of people. I’m not referring to the actual negligent discharge, but rather the way it’s reported in the story.

…causing the officer’s gun to fire…and grabbed the gun, causing it to fire…

You get the idea. The story itself is pretty much unremarkable, except that the way it’s written, the Trib would have you believe that his gun just “went off”, as if by magic. Let me see if I can reconstruct a likely method for this: Officer pulls gun, and inserts finger into trigger guard, suspect grabs gun/arm causing officer to reflexively tighten his finger, “bang” happens.

I guess the rules of gun safety don’t apply to the Only Ones.

Vintage Base Ball

You know, if shooting didn’t take up so much of my time, I’d probably look into the Indianapolis area Vintage Base Ball teams. Back in the late 1800’s, it was still spelled “base ball”, and hadn’t really changed to the modern spelling of “baseball” yet.

The game of Vintage Base Ball is analogous to Civil War re-enactments – they’re playing the game as it was played in the mid to late 1800’s, wearing period clothing and using period equipment.

Between racquetball, shooting, and blogging, I don’t know if my budget could support another hobby. But if it could Vintage Base Ball would be high on the list.

Range reviews

I have mixed feelings about doing this, because I don’t want my favorite shooting range to get all crowded with shooters every weekend. At the same time, it really is a great place to shoot, despite the fact that they’re only open on weekends.

If you’ve noticed, I usually go to the range every other weekend. When I go, I go to Eagle Creek Park Pistol Range. Their unofficial website is here, and it has a breakdown of the rules, calibers allowed, etc.

Right now, they only allow pistol, rimfire, and muzzleloading calibers (note on ML, you have to use Pyrodex or another BP substitute); currently centerfire rifles aren’t allowed. I keep hoping that one day I’ll check the website and there will be a big banner that says “you can now shoot centerfire rifles at Eagle Creek”. That would make me a happy boy. As it is, it’s nice to have a well built outdoor range where I can go shoot.

If you’re familiar with the Indianapolis area, you know that your shooting choices aren’t all that great. If you want an indoor range, you’re stuck with Popguns, or god forbid, Don’s Guns. Through my time in the Coast Guard, and in every waking moment I’ve had until today, I have never feared more for my life than when I was on the range at Don’s Guns. I won’t even put a link on my page to that clown. Popguns is pretty good, but it’s limited to 50 feet and no rifles. Plus, Popguns is always crowded as hell on weekends, thanks in part to their godawful “member” system, which I’ve heard their getting rid of. Honestly, the one thing that keeps me from going to Popguns (even in the winter) is that the wait time on a Saturday is just hideous.

I’ve heard good things about the Marion County Fish and Game association, but I don’t shoot there. My main reason for this is because according to their range rules, .22 Magnum rifles aren’t allowed, which pretty much kills my favorite rifle. However, they do have steel matches on Friday nights, which I keep meaning to shoot.

When you really get down to it, the main reason I like going to the range at Eagle Creek park are the people there. All the range staff are friendly, courteous, and helpful. Despite my youthful appearance, I have never been treated (or referred to) as “the kid”. In case I’ve not made it abundantly clear, the most efficient way to get me to never visit your range again is to condescend to me because I look young.

Short version – go to Eagle Creek. The wait times are short, the people are nice, and you can shoot all the way from 7 yards to 50 if your heart so desires. It’s a great place to shoot.

Us and them

If this story gets national play, I guarantee that certain aspects of it will be glossed over, and instead of focusing on the important issues, it will instead become a “guns are evil” and “let’s ban them for the children” story.

The short version is that a 3 year old child found a loaded gun and accidentally shot a 6 year old child. Unfortunately, that’s the only part of this story that you’ll probably hear about on CNN. Luckily, the local news actually has some valuable information.

According to police, the adults in the house fled with the exception of the 32-year-old man (the owner – ed.), who was arrested on charges of being a felon in possession of a firearm and leaving a loaded firearm within the reach of a child.

This is actually important. Everyone fled the house. “The cops are coming, everyone out” does not imply a house full of choirboys getting ready for a mission trip to the Fuzzy-Wuzzies. Here’s another puzzling development.

The mother of the boy who was shot baby sits the 3-year-old. She told police she was out for a walk at the time of the shooting, police said.

So…uh…who exactly was watching these kids? You’ll pardon me for saying, but the tragedy here is that this woman is probably a terrible parent. I mean, come on. Even the mayor of Milwaukee agrees with me.

“It’s despicable. It’s sickening. A 6-year-old is lying in a hospital bed right now recovering from a gunshot wound he suffered at the hands of a 3-year-old. Why were these kids unattended at 10 at night? How did they have access to a gun, an illegal gun?

I have the same questions, Mr. Mayor. Of course, I don’t blame the gun – I blame the house full of adults that allowed this to happen. But that’s just me, I don’t like to blame inanimate objects when there are actual, you know, people that are responsible. Like the 32 year old convicted felon who let children get access to his gun. Or the mother/babysitter who was “out taking a walk” when she should have been watching the kids. Or the house full of adults who apparently fled the house when they realized the cops were coming.

More on Liko Kenney

So, I’ve been casually engaged in a run-and-gun conversation with this chap regarding the Liko Kenney/Bruce McKay shooting. Chris King, the presumed author of said blog appears to be under the impression that McKay was a bad cop; and does in fact present some decent evidence in that regard.

Here’s my problem, and the source of my consternation on this issue. Even if McKay was a bad cop, even though he had rammed Kenney’s vehicle and then OC’d Kenney, it doesn’t justify shooting him. You don’t get to go around killing people, no matter how much you don’t like them.

The act of ramming Kenney’s car could be considered using potentially lethal force. However, at the time he was shot, McKay was not using, nor was he presenting, a credible threat of force. He was out of his car (so he couldn’t “squash Kenney’s car”), and he didn’t have his gun drawn. That’s not a threat of force.

No matter what McKay had done, you can’t twist the events into making Kenney some kind of folk hero. No matter which way you slice it, Kenney made the decision to shoot McKay, and that makes him responsible. There are plenty of legal options available for people who are legitimately abused by the police – Kenney didn’t pursue any of those.

I don’t care if McKay was a bad cop. In this situation, it’s irrelevant. Until someone can come up with a truly legitimate reason for Kenney hauling off and blasting McKay, Liko Kenney will remain to me as nothing more than another murderous scumbag.

Home Defense, part 3

In the conclusion to the home defense series, I want to take a very brief look at the different tactical options that are available during a home invasion. In part 1, non-lethal and common sense ideas for home security were discussed, including trimming hedges, getting an alarm, and cutting back trees. Part 2 looked at the various weapons available to a homeowner, from less-lethal items such as pepper spray, all the way up to shotguns and rifles (sorry, no crossbows – ed.). Today, the previous two entries come together in the actual tactical situation of a home invasion.

Have a plan
This is the most important piece of advice regarding a potential intrusion into your home. You should have a plan, and all your family should know the plan and know their role. It should be noted that “having a plan” applies to a lot more than just home invasions, you should have a fire emergency plan, or if you live in an area with natural disasters, a plan for that as well.

Every person who reads this blog has a different living situation. Some of you are single. Some of you are married, some of you have kids. Your plan will probably not be the same as mine since our situations are different. What I’m doing is presenting my plan, as well as some guidelines and other thoughts.

Your most effective weapon
Isn’t a 12 gauge, it’s not an M4, it’s not a Ruger GP100. It’s your mind. While you can never be truly ready for a home invasion, you can certainly be more prepared than most. Unfortunately, to do so involves accepting an uncomfortable fact, which my wife rather eloquently stated yesterday: Just because you feel safe, doesn’t mean that you are safe. I knew I married her for a reason.

There exists what I believe to be an erroneous belief that in a moment of crisis, you will “know what to do” – I don’t buy that for a minute. In a moment of crisis, you brain will default to whatever training you’ve hardwired into it.

The situation
It’s 2am, and your home alarm system goes off. You ascertain that the alarm was triggered by the glassbreak sensor on the glass door. The alarm panel indicates that the door is now off it’s track. You silence the alarm (not cancel) so you can hear, and you hear someone banging around inside your house.

This is one of the reasons that I strongly recommend home alarm systems, as it makes it easy to identify if there is a legitimate intruder in your house. Additionally, if you’re unable to call 911 yourself, the alarm company will contact the police for you. However, if at all possible, I recommend that you call 911 personally. Generally speaking, the police are more likely to respond with rapidity if there is a real person saying “there’s someone in my house” than if Brinks calls and reports an alarm.

The plan
For me, the plan is exceedingly simple. Mrs. Ahab calls 911 and removes herself from the line of fire; our bedroom is set up in such a way that I can achieve semi-concealment and a stable firing platform with a clean line of sight at our door. The bedroom door is the “go-line”, if an intruder crosses that line they’re met with the commencement of hostilities on my part. Mrs. Ahab’s job is stay on the phone with the 911 operator until the police are outside our door.

Part of this is where mindset comes into play. We have made the decision that nothing in house is worth dying, or killing, for. We have no children, so there are no other people in the house whose safety we’re responsible. So, our mindset is “TVs, phones, and appliances can be replaced. Lives can’t.” The correlation to that is that we have made the decision before the fact that no one crosses the “line in the sand”. Again, it’s important to make this decision, and revisit it on a regular basis. In a crisis, your brain is going to go to “default mode”, and your rules of engagement must be hardwired in.

In a perfect situation, the alarm scares off the goblin, the police show up in a timely fashion, and then I fix my broken door. I am not willing to bet my life on a perfect situation.

  • Note – if you don’t have an alarm system, the above applies if you can adequately ascertain that there is in fact an intruder. If you have to leave your bedroom to investigate (a risky proposition) the advice in the following section applies, from a tactical standpoint. If you must leave to investigate a noise, once the source of the noise is determined, get back to your safe area. Don’t go badguy hunting, get back to the safe room and call 911. Or clean up the glass and scold the cats.

Going mobile
I know what you’re thinking – it’s probably “I have children”. The unfortunate reality of this is that it requires you to leave the relative safety of your bedroom, and go mobile. Unfortunately, this is where things can go all squirrelly. Obviously, leaving your room changes your tactical position from that of a static defender to a more mobile operator. Ask anyone who has ever had to clear a house, or a boat, or any other kind of fixed structure. It is positively nerve wracking.

Your children must be aware of what to do if the alarm goes off. Our plan is for the children to remain in their rooms, doors locked, until I come and get them. Have a password set up so that your kids will know it’s you on the other side of the door. Under no circumstances should they open that door to anyone without the password.

Something that a lot of people don’t think about in this area is tool selection, say you’ve selected a 12 gauge shotgun as your home defense weapon, but you have a small child that needs to be carried back to your safe room. You can’t really carry a small child and keep your two handed weapon ready. If your children are all ambulatory, take the shotgun when you retrieve them. If not, leave the shotgun with your wife in the safe room and take a handgun.

If you’ve gone mobile, it’s also important that whomever is on the phone with 911 inform the operator that you’re mobile. Wouldn’t want to be swapping lead with cops. Similarly, once you’re back, inform the 911 operator that you’re back.

Let there be light
I like flashlights. I keep one by my bed, “just in case”. In case the power goes out, in case of a lot of things, a flashlight is handy. People will argue back and forth for days, months, years, about whether or not you should have a flashlight if you go mobile. I am decidedly “pro-flashlight”. If your home defense weapon is a two hander, such as a shotgun or a rifle, it makes sense to have the light mounted on that weapon. If your weapon is a pistol, I am conflicted about whether or not a weapon mounted light offers any advantages.

Here is one personal tidbit about light. Don’t go around turning on lights . In the middle of the night, your eyes are as adjusted to see in the dark as they’re going to be. You know the layout of your house better than any intruder, and that gives you a small advantage. Plus, if you’re carrying a flashlight, turning on lights defeats your ability to use your flashlight to blind/dazzle an intruder.

The main reason why I am “pro-flashlight” is target identification. Your ability to positively identify your target is extremely important, and I can’t stress positive target identification enough. Don’t shoot unless you’re sure of the target. Don’t shoot unless you’re sure of the target.

Worst case scenario
The worst case scenario in any home invasion is one where you have to pull the trigger. If you’ve set everything else up correctly, it means that somewhere one (or more) of your precautions has broken down, and now violence is your only option.

This is the primary situation where you mindset is most important. You have to made the decision to pull the trigger well beforehand. It’s not a cold-blooded decision, it’s not a decision to kill; it’s a decision that you will take whatever force is necessary to defend your life and the life of your family. You absolutely cannot decide what you will kill or die for in the heat of the moment – it must be made before the fact and constantly revisited, to the point where it truly is hardwired.

I am aware that the above statement could be misconstrued to sound rather bloodthirsty, however it’s nothing of the sort. I have personally witnessed people freeze up at the moment of critical action, simply because their mind had no default setting upon which to operate. They hadn’t made the decision before the fact, and were unprepared when the moment arrived. Again, it’s not a bloodthirsty sentiment. It’s a simple fact – you must be mentally prepared to take action.

Summary
Have a plan – if you have children, make sure they know the plan. There is no way I could address every tactical situation that could unfold during a home invasion; and I am aware that I have painted with a very broad brush.

What I cannot emphasize enough is that you must be mentally prepared. I am fully aware that subject of mental preparedness could encompass several dozen articles all by itself; nevermind the fact that each individual prepares themselves mentally in a completely different way. The ultimate point of this is that the old saying of “you fight like you train” is completely true. In the event of a crisis, your brain defaults to whatever training you have assimilated. Just as you train your ability with a firearm, you must train your mind for the moment of action.

New Book – Written with Lead

I found this book in Barnes & Noble last night, and for 8 bucks I figured I could afford it. Apparently, it’s an update to a book that was originally published in 1992, the version I have includes three modern incidents, the Waco incident, Columbine, and the DC Snipers.

Once I finish it, I’ll post a full review – but right off the bat I want to question the inclusion of Columbine and the DC Snipers. The book purports to chronicle “America’s Gunfights”, which generally implies a mutual exchange of hot lead between (at least) two parties. Columbine and the DC attacks were the actions of cowards who did not “swap lead” with any other armed parties.

If anyone has read either the new version or the original ’92 version, I’m interested in your thoughts.