Interesting article

So, I didn’t even know that Jewelers had a magazine, but I guess I shouldn’t be too surprised. There’s a magazine for everything. Anyway, in a recent article, the issue of guns in stores is discussed. The author appears to be in favor of keeping a firearm in the store, or at the very least she’s in favor of fighting back against robbery attempts.

She then goes on to ask five questions to store owners regarding firearms in the workplace. I’m going to answer questions 3 & 4 from my perspective as a consumer.

  1. Do you have a gun in your store? If so, are your employees aware of it or do you feel they don’t need to know because they aren’t supposed to use it anyway? Have you had an employee not want to work at your store because you kept a gun on the premise?
  2. Have you thought about keeping a gun on premise—what made you decide to have or not have one?
  3. Is fighting back with guns giving bad publicity to jewelry stores?
  4. Will these shootings make customers scared of entering jewelry stores without officers on the premise?
  5. What do you tell your staff to do if you’re robbed? (The obvious should be to do what they want because the merchandise is insured and lives are more important).

3 – No, it’s really not. In fact, I’m more likely to patronize an establishment where I know that the proprietor is willing to fight back to defend his life, and the lives of his customers. I think that’s pretty keen.

4 – Only if those customers are idiots. I can understand being reticent to go into a jewelry store that’s been robbed seven or eight times in the past month, because it’s probably not in a nice area. However, if I go to jewelry store where the owner has righteously plugged some asshole, the other assholes are going to think twice before they hit the place, lest they receive a dose of hot lead.

In short – if you own a jewelry store and make the choice to keep a firearm on the premise to defend your livelihood: Good for you. If I know about it, I’m more likely to patronize your establishment.

Why use the truth

When appeals to emotion and false “statistics” are much more efficient. I suppose I could title today’s post as “Boston pushes more gun control, in similar news, the sun rose in the east today.” I guess it’s just the nature of this particular little “campaign” that irks me – the whole fake ransom note from the NRA stating that “they have the president and congress”.

Seriously, what is it with these people and the NRA? If the Brady Campaign, etc were to be believed, you’d think that the NRA actually wants people to buy guns and shoot small children with them.

Honestly, it reminds me of the campaign to demonize tobacco companies during the Clinton administration. Of course, now it’ being targeted at the NRA – because we all know that the NRA personally gives people guns so they can shoot babies with them.

Look Ma, One Hand

My latest edition of Guns & Ammo arrived in the mail today; and to my everlasting surprise there was an article that I was quite fascinated by. A short summary of the article would go as follows: “It’s probably better to learn to shoot one handed for defensive purposes than two handed”. Oddly enough, I completely agree with the author.

Unfortunately, the article itself isn’t on Guns & Ammo’s website, at least where I could find it, so you’re left to listen to me babble about why I agree with the general premise and application of the practice.

First off, shooting with two hands is good. It allows more stability on the gun during aiming, and more control for rapid follow-up shots. This is a good thing, and if you have the time to get both paws on the gun, you probably should. That being said, in a defensive situation, you might not have the time to get two hands on the gun.

However, in a defensive situation, most people are much more likely to exhibit the standard human reaction when confronted, which is to crouch down and literally thrust the firearm towards the target with whatever hand happens to be holding the shooting iron.

While some shooting schools address the issue of shooting defensively with one hand, it is rarely (if ever) the primary focus of the class. Every class I’ve been to has emphasized the two handed grip, so that you can place more hits on target faster. Again, that’s not a bad thing, but I think that it’s turning a blind eye to reality of a lot of self defense engagements.

Now, before you start beating me abouts the head and neck for this, I’m not saying that shooting schools should abandon isosceles or weaver and go back to teaching one handed shooting. However, I do think that training courses should offer equal time to two handed shooting and single handed combat shooting.

The importance of the ability to operate a handgun with one hand is even more important to the armed citizen. Let’s face it, if you or I run into trouble while we’re carrying concealed, the odds of us running into that trouble with our heater drawn and in a firm two handed low ready grip is pretty slim. However, the odds of you having your iron in the holster and needing to get it out RIGHT NOW and place some lead on target are pretty good.

Being able to shoot fast and accurately in a stress situation with one hand requires practice, and training. I want to continue to look at the pros and cons of training to shoot defensively with a single hand on the pistol through the next few weeks.

In the meantime, the next time you go to the range, try a basic double-tap drill with a one handed grip. Unless you’ve been practicing a lot, you should find this pretty challenging.

I can’t believe I missed it!

Thanks to Sebastian, I’m reminded that 7/7/07 was the 60th Birthday of the good old “Automat Kalishnikov”, or as it’s commonly know, the AK47.

Considered by some to be the finest military assault rifle ever created, the AK has been involved in every major (and most of the minor) military conflict since Vietnam. It has fought for and against tyranny, and over the years has earned a well deserved reputation for absolute bomb-proof reliability in battle.

Happy 60th AK47!

Every now and then

A little bit of common sense actually prevails. I’m not talking about the part where Jesse Jackson is ranting about hunting people with AK47s, or where the SF Gate allows their startling bias to show through, or even the part where a San Francisco DA (impartiality? What impartiality) introduced Jackson at the start of the rally. No, I’m talking about this little gem of absolute wisdom, buried down near the end of the article.

Lorrain Taylor of Hayward, whose twin 22-year-old sons were gunned down in Oakland in February 2000 while working on a car, left the rally skeptical.

“I think we’re not looking at the root of the problem. This sounds very political,” Taylor said. “Closing down the gun shops will not stop the violence. … I don’t think the source is the gun stores. It’s a deep spiritual problem.”

You know, I’m honestly shocked that the SF Gate would print that. Honestly though, this is great stuff. This is someone acknowledging that the problem with violence lies with the community, and not with the gun shops, or guns, or whatever. I applaud Ms. Taylor for her candor and intelligence.

At the same time, I’m sort of confused as to why Jesse Jackson is all of a sudden on the gun control issue. I guess he must have gotten tired of flogging one dead horse and decided to flog a different dead horse for a while.

E-Postal Match: Shrinking Circles

Out to Eagle Creek Park Pistol Range yesterday to shoot Mr. Completely’s E-Postal Match, hosted by the Conservative UAW Guy.

This month’s match is called “Shrinking Circles”, and as you’ll see from the targets, it’s deceptively difficult. I shot it with my Taurus Tracker, my EAA Bounty Hunter .22 Magnum, and the ubiquitous Walther P22. It was an interesting day to say the least. If the competition is still going on on the 28th, I plan on brining the sooper-sekrit “Mr. Completely Beater” .22 out for its inaugural run.

Anyway, on to the guns. I opened the day with the EAA Bounty Hunter, entered in the Rimfire Iron Sights category. I like to start with that gun because it’s pretty heavy, and of the three I brought with me, it has the worst sights. The irons are just a standard single action set of post and groove, so sometimes accuracy isn’t easy.

However, yesterday I shot the Bounty Hunter pretty well. In fact, I shot it much better than the P22, which I normally shoot very well. Here are my targets for the Bounty Hunter.

Bounty Hunter, 2 Hands

Bounty Hunter, 1 Hand

Although the double on the 1 on the 2 handed target is somewhat embarrassing, I’m rather pleased that I knocked out a 68 on the 1 handed target. All told, I’m pretty pleased with my total score for the Bounty Hunter, 132 points isn’t too bad.

After the .22 Magnum, I switched gears to the Taurus Tracker. I was using .38 Special 130 grain FMJ, which as I discovered later was something of a mistake. Here are the targets for the Tracker.

Taurus Tracker, 2 hands

Taurus Tracker, 1 hand

The two handed target was just straight ugly. I have no idea what was going on there, other than I couldn’t settle down with the Tracker into anything that resembled a consisted groove. The single handed target was much, much better, a factor which I attribute to one part dumb stupid luck, and the other part the fact that I switch to 158 grain LRN Blazer ammo, which the Tracker just LOVED. I couldn’t figure that one out, normally the 130 grain Magtech rounds are a favorite of this gun.

The final gun I brought was the ever-present Walther P22, and I’m disappointed to say that I shot it like crap.

P22, 2 hands

P22, 1 hand

A 56 and a 57 are certainly not going to be good enough to beat Mr. Completely. Missing the 10 and the 11 on the 2 handed target really hurt me, and then after taking two shots to get the 10 on the single-handed target; I made the somewhat dubious decision to try for a lucky shot on the 12/13 area instead of taking the higher percentage shot at the 9.

I have to say, this is probably my favorite match to date, as it in addition to placing emphasis on marksmanship, it also forces me to actually have a strategy when I go into the shoot. If the contest is still running on the 28th, I’m definitely going to get a couple more guns entered and see how they do.

More England’s crime solution

Today’s show is sponsored by the UK Police forces, dedicated to scaring the crap out of your kids by charing the yard with submachine guns.

Armed police confronted a ten-year-old boy who was showing his friend a plastic toy gun at his home.

At. His. Home. You know, if I were a member of the English “five-oh”, I would get good and goddamn tired of all these idiots calling in the SWAT teams on 10 years, or teenage girls in cowgirl outfits, or whatever moronic stunt is being pulled this week in the name of “safety”.

I must say though, if I were visiting the UK, I would feel pretty comfortable knowing that if a 10 year old pulled a squirt gun on me, the cops would be there to protect me.

Ignorance of the law is no excuse

Even if it’s a bullshit law, like Chicago/Illinois gun laws. A woman from Tennessee, who possess a valid concealed carry permit in Tennessee was arrested yesterday at the Sears Tower in Chicago for possession of a firearm.

Stephanie Warren, 56, of Memphis was waiting to see the Chicago skyline from the top of Chicago’s tallest attraction when she placed her bag on the belt of the security machine, police said.

Inside the purse was a loaded .38-caliber revolver, police said.

I feel bad for Ms. Warren; however I must preface the body of this entry with the fact that she should have been aware of Illinois and Chicago’s gun laws. Like the title says, ignorance of the law is no excuse. Now that I have that out of the way, let me get to the point.

“It didn’t dawn on her that our state did not have the same gun laws as hers did,” said police spokeswoman Monique Bond.

This bothers me. For some reason, the way I read this it came off as really smarmy and arrogant. I’m probably reading too much into it; but I can just hear the scorn in the police spokeswoman’s voice: “It didn’t dawn on her that our enlightened state did not have the same gun laws as her backwards hickstate” or something like that. Of course, that’s probably just my reading. I hope.

No visitors were in any danger, and there was no interruption for the dozens of tourists awaiting the elevator ride to the Skydeck, Bond said. Police recommended that Warren be charged with a felony for unlawful use of a weapon, she said.

This is what really bugs me, however. No one was in any danger, and in another article (I think in the Sun-Times) the police mention that the weapon was not brandished, in fact it never came out of her purse. So of course the only proper choice of action is to completely ruin this woman’s life by charging her with a felony. The police mouthpiece even went so far as to say that “We want people to know we take our gun laws seriously”. You could add “so instead of trying to control the gang violence, we’re going to ruin the life of a suburban housewife from Tennessee”.

It’s not all bad news; the prosecutor’s office declined to file felony charges, instead charging the woman with three misdemeanors. I’m glad that the DA has a bit of common sense and that Ms. Warren will not loose her ability to own firearms – but she shouldn’t have been charged with a crime to begin with.

Like I said, I understand that ignorance of the law is no excuse. At the same time, I really do feel like the Chicago police overreacted here. I suppose that if she had pulled the gun out of her purse and started waving the thing around than I would understand an arrest. Also, this reflects a personal frustration of mine. I live close enough to Chicago that it’s completely within reason for me to go visit on a day trip or a weekend excursion. However, thanks to Chicago’s idiotic gun laws, I can’t carry there. Incidents like this only strengthen my resolve to not patronize any of Chicago with my money or time.

I understand the economic impact of me not going to Chicago is insignificant, but if I can be expected to be arrested and threatened with felony charges merely for trying to provide for my safety in a city that has a serious crime problem, well I think I’ll go to Knoxville instead.

In fact, for my Hoosier readers if you’re thinking about a trip to an interesting city that honors your Indiana CCW, here’s a list of destinations where your permit is valid.

Denver, CO
Charlotte, NC
Atlanta, GA
Miami, FL
Orlando, FL
New Orleans, LA
Lexington, KY
Louisville, KY
Knoxville, TN

Link to Indiana Reciprocity map


Good news from Ohio

A senior citizen in Ohio has opened a BB-gun range, specifically targeted towards getting kids into shooting.

Ted Dowdell decided to turn the barn next to his home into a free shooting range for children.

“The kids don’t get a chance to shoot a BB these days,” Dowdell said.

As you might have guessed, I’m all in favor of this. I whiled away countless hours blasting at soda cans, tin cans, magazine covers, and a whole host of improvised targets with my BB gun when I was a kid. It was fun, safe, and served as a gateway into the shooting sports for me.

Of course, I didn’t need a “BB gun range”, because the acre behind the house served quite adequately in that regard. That being said, I’m in favor of anything that introduces more youngsters to shooting.