Mexican police disregard US law

I know, I know, what a surprise, right?  Three Mexican police officers were arrested at a Phoenix area gun show for purchasing firearms.

If you read the article in its entirety,  apparently they were purchasing weapons for their personal use, and even more shockingly so, the purchase was made from a private seller, not an FFL.

Now, I’m glad that the local Five-Oh were on the spot with arresting these clowns.  It’s absolutely repugnant to me that cops from another country have such blatant disregard for our laws.  Additionally, I actually hope the “private seller” gets punished for this.  If he had any inkling that these three amigos (ha!) weren’t US citizens, he had no business selling them firearms.  The last thing I want is for the anti’s to have any legitimate ammo and start screaming about the “gun show loophole” again.

On the flip side, this does demonstrate something that most people in the pro-gun community have always believed; if you’re looking for a cop, go to a gun show.  They’re usually crawling with cops, and in this case, the cops were right on the spot.

Ultimately, I’m incredibly upset about this whole thing.  The disregard for our laws, both from the Mexican cops and from the “private seller” who sold them the guns is utterly appalling to me.  Admittedly, there was a happy ending in that the criminals responsible were arrested.  Of course, they’ll probably just get a slap on the wrist, because god forbid we actually prosecute foreign nationals that break our laws.

Picking on Canada

I shouldn’t pick on Canada so much; the problem is that those Soviet Canuckistanis make it so damn easy, when they do stuff like this.

Ontario Liberal Leader Dalton McGuinty said Wednesday that he does not want to see the provinces’ schools resort to installing metal detectors and having uniformed security officers patrol the halls in the wake of Tuesday’s fatal stabbing at a Toronto high school.

Such a move, he said, would amount to the Americanization of schools in Ontario.

“I see that as an absolute last resort,” Mr. McGuinty told reporters during an election campaign stop.

Instead, he said, Ontario needs to distinguish itself from the United States by imposing an outright ban on hand guns.

“Let’s ban handguns in Ontario,” he said. “Let’s ban handguns across the country. Let’s declare war against handguns.”

A 16-year-old Scarborough youth was stabbed to death on Tuesday on a walkway leading from Winston Churchill Collegiate Institute.

Here’s what kills me.  Putting in metal detectors and adding security staff would actually help with a violence problem.  You’d be able to screen children for weapons, and then have actual staff to enforce the rules.

Gun Control: It’s what you do when you don’t want to do anything.  An outright ban on handguns would do absolutely nothing to prevent young miscreants from packing heat.

I really have come to the conclusion that when it comes to American gun control, we ignore the developments in Canada at our own peril.

Bring on the Seattle Moonbats

A couple of days ago, I blagged about how the Makah tribe in Pac Northwest was being investigated by the Coast Guard for illegally hunting a grey whale out of season.  While the focus of my blog post was on my surprise that the ATF hadn’t shown up at the first whiff of the word “machine gun” (which turned out to be no machine gun at all), it did occur to me at the time that the granola-eating-save-the-whales-hippy-nutbags in the Seattle metro area would go apeshit over this.

Needless to say, I was 100% right.  In response to the original article in the Times (which does not mention a machine gun) I am duly rewarded with one of the most hysterical pages of editorials that I have ever seen.

So the Makah Tribe seeks its “right” to harvest whales for cultural purposes — in a ritual that makes as much sense in modern times as the Incas sacrificing children to the Corn God to ensure a plentiful harvest — and then slaughters a gray whale illegally with a machine gun? That’s one proud tradition.

This one is my favorite.  In the span of a paragraph, he says that whales are morally equivalent to people, and claims that a machine gun was used.  What’s really funny is that the original Times article specifically says that the weapon used was a “high powered Weatherby rifle”, and CNN reports it as a .50 BMG rifle, not a .50 caliber machine gun.  But let’s not let facts interfere with our hysterics.

“Cultural”? With a machine gun? What type of culture needs a machine gun to kill a defenseless animal?

As a former Seattle resident, I understand culture and am appalled. After all, I have lived in Saipan for 12 years with Chamorros, Carolinians, Filipinos, Koreans, Japanese and other people from the Asia Pacific region. I now live in Guam, with people from the same area. This is the first I have heard that using a machine gun is “culturally OK” to meet subsistence fishing rights.

Once again, it was not a machine gun.  But that’s okay, because clearly the fact that you’ve lived all over the Asia Pacific region qualifies you as an expert in North American Indian Tribe.  God, I really hate pretentious liberals.

Since Phil already has a link up to original incident at RNS I probably won’t have to wait too long to get his commentary on the moonie reaction.

For the record: I do not think killing whales is cool.  It’s not that I don’t think they shouldn’t be killed, but I do think that they should not be wasted as the whale in this question was.  It’s meat and blubber went to waste, and that is sad.

September 11th, 2007

We all know what happened six years ago today, and I won’t belabor the issue.

Instead, I’m going to do something I’ve never done, and I’m going to do it in the spirit of working together as a country, even the people you’re working with have opposing political ideals.

In the Indianapolis Metro area, the “alternative” paper is called Nuvo, and it’s a truly terrible rag that I probably wouldn’t use to line a bird cage with.  That being said, on September 5th, one of their columnists (who I should note is a die-hard liberal) wrote the following column, which I’m linking to now.

It’s time these crazy conspiracy theories stop. If someone has irrefutable proof of a government conspiracy, bring it forward. Failing that, let the victims of Sept. 11 rest in peace. We should honor their memory by working towards a better nation, not by inventing silly theories on how they died.

I heartily agree.  Please click over to Nuvo to read the entire article.

California microstamping

And a bit of a free history/civics lesson, as well.

In my old home state of California, the bill that would mandate all guns manufactured after January 1st, 2010 has been sent to the Governator for his signature.  Now, being the skeptic that I am, I somehow don’t think that microstamping is actually going to help solve crimes.  I know that Maryland’s ballistic fingerprint database was a huge money pit; and in addition to being a huge money pit it didn’t really help any thing.

But that didn’t stop the California legislature from voting pretty much exactly down party lines on this bill.  Now, because the article I’ve picked is from a San Diego paper, it’s not quite as loony as some of the other things you’ll see.

The bill covers only new models or brands of semiautomatic handguns approved for sale in the state after Jan. 1, 2010. That excludes nearly 1,300 different semiautomatics already sold in the state. Revolvers, which do not discharge shell casings, also are not covered.

Like others have said, you can’t un-invent technology.  Unless they amend the bill to require all 1,300 of those guns to be taken in and have a firing pin put in them, which of course would then create a de facto gun registry.

We know that microstamping won’t work.  I can change the firing pin on a Glock in a matter of minutes; and just a little bit longer for a Beretta.

Back to the article – despite being largely well balanced and written, it does contain a few things I’d like to pick squares with.

More than 60 percent of homicides in California are committed with handguns and about 70 percent of the handguns sold in the state are semiautomatics, according to a legislative analysis of the bill.

What you have there is a false correlation.  While I don’t doubt that each statistic cited has individual value, it’s tremendously misleading to put them side by side like that.  Just because 60% of homicides are committed with handguns does not mean that the 70% of handguns which are sold legally and happen to be semi-automatics ever end up in crime.   How do I know they’ve been sold legally?  Because you can’t really track illegal sales.  There’s no record.

The second issue is one that I find personally irksome, as it is an error that no alleged “journalist” should ever be caught making.

To those that invoked the Second Amendment, Assemblyman Sandré Swanson offered up another passage from the Constitution.

“This is about life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness,” said Swanson

“Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness” is not in the Constitution.  Holy Hell, did you miss every single US History class in freakin’ middle school?  The phrase that was quoted by Sandre Swanson is actually from the Declaration of Independence.  For Assemblyman Swanson, and the writer of this article, I have copied the relevant text here so that you may hopefully educate yourselves.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. –That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed…

Honestly, not knowing where that quote comes from is shameful.  Endorsing the microstamping bill is foolish enough, but displaying your ignorance is even worse.

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

That is the title of the new Indiana Jones movie, which is going to be released into theatres on May 22, 2008.

I love Indiana Jones.  I even loved the Young Indiana Jones Chronicles.  The character of Indiana Jones resonates with everything I wanted to be when I was growing up: He’s a dashing scoundrel, he’s well educated, he gets all the chicks.  To me, Indy was always about three orders of magnitude cooler than James Bond, and I still believe that Indiana Jones would beat the hell out of Bond in a fight.

I am optimistic about this movie.  After the horror that the Star Wars prequels visited upon my poor, nerdy soul; I still cling to the belief that my childhood heroes are just as amazing now as they were when I was a child.  I really hope this movie is as amazing as I’m hoping.