We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Had mine for about a year, love it but the manual says change the recoil spring every 3000 rounds. Would be great if i could find some but even sigs website doesn’t have them.
It’ll be interesting to see if you can get it to feed, fire & eject reliably. Every reviewer I’ve seen has had multiple problems. None of which stops me from fondling a 938 every time I come across one, thinking that this is the best “pocket 9” design around . . . if only it worked.
Hey Chad, that is why I want to hear from those who own them. As I mentioned above, I have a P232 and a P290, I’ve had issues with both of them. They are accurate, and like the P938, very nicely fitting in the hand. But I can’t afford to have another $550 to $750 gun that is not reliable at least 99% of the time. Neither one of them is better than 96%. The P232 is closer to 92%. Even my LCP is 99%.