Blast from the past

Browsing Youtube at night is dangerous, you just might run across a video that someone put together of the commercials for the Hellstorm Trigger System, and the GAT Trigger.

If you don’t remember the Hellstorm, it was basically a $30 piece of metal that made it slightly easier to bump fire your semi-autos and not hit anything.  The GAT trigger was better, sort of, in that it allowed you to fire from the supported shoulder position, but you had to make a really inappropriate motion with your finger to get the thing going.  Now, maybe my mind’s in the gutter on that one, but I calls ’em as I sees ’em.

The video is here, in all its awful 80’s glory.  Look at those clothes, man.

The greatest homeschool myth

It seems that my discussion of homeschooling is far from over, as thanks to Tamara, I am directed to part of the California ruling on homeschooling which I hadn’t addressed directly in my previous post.

This excerpt is the section which I am talking about most directly:

Specifically, the appeals court said, the trial court had found that “keeping the children at home deprived them of situations where … they could develop emotionally in a broader world than the parents’ ‘cloistered’ setting.

Tamara quite correctly asks the question about when did it become “normal” to put our children into state run facilities, surrounded by other children their own age, all in the name of their “development”; when traditionally children were raised in the company of adults.  She’s quite on the money, and you should read her post.

I want to address something tangental to that, namely that the California court has essentially enshrined in law what is the greatest myth of homeschooling, and the lie most often touted by anti-homeschool advocates, that of “under-socialization” in homeschool kids.

What they believe is that kids who do not go to public or private school do not develop normal relationships like “other kids”, because they’re not exposed to the everyday social interaction with their peers; anti-homeschoolers further contend that this lack of “socialization” hampers the ability of the child to interact productively with their peers later in life.

Quite frankly, it’s a bunch of crap.  Now, I admit I’m not necessarily helping my point with the language there, however I need to make a very clear point.  When it comes to homeschooling, your child will be no more or less “socialized” than if they had gone to public school.  If you take a shy, introverted kid and stick him or her in public school, he/she is still going to be shy and introverted.  If you take an outgoing child and homeschool them, they are going to be outgoing and social.

The problem is one of perception, where anti-homeschool types believe that homeschooled children are sitting around in their rooms with no social interaction whatsoever.  Unfortunately, the facts don’t back that up.  If you took a representative sample of homeschool families, one of the connecting factors for many (not all) homeschoolers is that they’re also very active in the church, or like my family, a part of a homeschool support group.

Although anecdotes aren’t evidence, I’m more than willing to offer my brothers and myself up as examples.  My older and younger brothers, as well as myself, were all homeschooled.  My older brother is pretty “middle of the road” when it comes to personality, not really outgoing, not introverted either.  He’s never had a problem making friendships or working with other people in a productive environment.  Take me next; I’m very outgoing and have a very…forceful personality.  My only problem in establishing relationships has been that I’m naturally a very selfish person, which no amount of “socialization” has been able to change.  Finally, there’s my younger brother, Number 3 (brother 4 wasn’t homeschooled through high school) who is relatively introverted, and always has been.  When we were in high school and hanging out with our other high school friends, it was always that way.  Hasn’t changed.

When homeschooling is done right, children have plenty of opportunities to play with other children and develop those important social skills.  They learn things like competition, fair play, and that sometimes the bigger, stronger kid gets what he wants because he’s bigger and stronger.  When you hear an anti-homeschooling person say that “homeschooled children aren’t given enough opportunies to socialize”, what they’re really saying is “homeschooled kids aren’t being given any indoctrination about how to ‘play nice’ and they’re all independent and stuff”.

The point is that homeschooled kids have just as many opportunities for social interaction as kids who go to public school if the parent gets involved, which is actually key to successful homeschooling.  In fact, a lot of homeschool support groups work with local Christian schools so that homeschool kids can play sports and engage in other activities.

If anyone is thinking about homeschooling, and has questions about successful methods, success stories, or just some general advice – drop me a line at admiralahab (at) gmail.com.

Your bias is showing

I always crack up when people tell me that there’s no media bias against guns, especially when it’s as plain as the nose on your face in articles like the linked piece from Reueters.  In an article which is allegedly talking about how collecting firearms is a legitimate hobby, the article is littered with phrases which display the anti-gun bias of the author.

An odd contraption in retired firefighter Alex Black’s cluttered garage looks a bit like the hand winch at the top of a well. In fact, it is a machinegun.

Turning the shiny brass handle spat out a withering hail of bullets that transformed modern warfare.

Except that it’s not.  That gun, which you have to turn the handle to fire, is a Gatling Gun, and while it does fire rapidly, it most certainly is not a machine gun.  A machine gun requires you to pull the trigger one time to fire a constant stream of bullets until you release the trigger or the gun runs out of ammo.  Contrast that with a Gatling Gun, where you have to manually cycle the handle to fire the rounds.  Essentially, the handle is a big round trigger.

The rest of the article contains a choice selection of weasel statements, sentences carefully constructed to appear unbiased on their surface, but which are in fact quite heavily slanted.  Review the following statements and tell me if you think they’re biased (my comments in italics):

The owners are not just urban criminals and drug dealers. (implying that it’s surprising that people other than criminals own guns)

The arsenal of revolvers, semi-automatic pistols, rifles and carbines spans conflicts from the American Civil War right up to World War Two, and all the guns are legally held. (as opposed the scourge of illegally owned Mausers causing random gang shootings)

He has a private arsenal of around 100 handguns, shotguns and rifles of all sorts (media outlets love the world “arsenal”, it’s all scary and military sounding)

and rifles to pop off prairie dogs over an afternoon in the countryside with a case of beer. (because we’re alcoholics as well)

It’s pretty much par for the course; sadly.  Even relatively positive articles about firearms ownership have to be carefully qualified.  For example, I had to say “relatively” there, because while it had some positive points, the almost subconscious insertion of biased language goes a long way towards undoing any positive effects the article might have had.

Dereliction of Duty

In addition to being a very serious offense under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, it’s also an excellent book authored by retired Lieutenant Colonel Robert Patterson, USAF who was one of President Clinton’s military aides during the Clinton years.  The military aides to the President are responsible for carrying the “nuclear football“, or the briefcase that contains the nuclear launch codes.

One of the things that I like most about the book, and may have blogged about before, is that it’s not written as an attack on the Clintons, but rather an eye-witness account of how the Whitehouse was run during the Clinton years; seen through the eyes of a professional soldier.

If you haven’t read it, I encourage you to pick up a copy.  Today, it could serve as a preview of what we have in store from a Clinton or Obama presidency.  While I don’t think they would be exactly the same, I don’t think that Obama has any less contempt for the military than Hillary does.

One of my greatest concerns about the upcoming election is the (continued) mis-use of our nation’s armed forces as some sort of Global Police, or worse yet, a Red Cross with guns.  That concern is actually one of the reasons that I will continue to support John McCain, because of the candidate available, I think he is the most invested in actually working in the best interests of our military.

If you’re undecided, and you’re wondering what another Clinton Whitehouse would look like, look no further than Dereliction of Duty.

More on Homeschooling

The more I read stories like this one (from RL via Malkin) the more I really want to homeschool my children.

Hauser noted that this isn’t the first time that Deerfield High School and the school district have come at cross-purposes to parents. The district ordered 14-year-old freshmen to take a seminar that amounted to homosexual indoctrination, she said, and had them sign a confidentiality agreement promising not to tell their parents.

Now, before you can get on my case about being homophobic or some other stupid shit; hold on.  I actually want any eventual children of mine to be exposed to ideas and opinions which are radically different from mine, but I want to know about it.  I certainly would not want the school district going behind my back with my child and then instructing said child to not tell me about it.

Like I said, I want my kids exposed to opinions that may disagree with my opinions and beliefs, but I want to know about it.

New podcast feature

I’m doing some updates, pretty soon there should be a “podcast” button which will take you to direct links of all the .mp3 files I’ve done.

Since the audio stuff has become a pretty big hit, I’m going to make it a weekly feature.  But I require some feedback, because I don’t know which day I want to run the podcasts on.  Would you prefer Monday, Wednesday, or Friday?

Happy Hour with Michael Bane

Attendees of the 2a Blog Bash will get to enjoy happy hour with Michael Bane on Friday the 16th, at the Bass Pro Shop in Clarksville, Indiana.

If you’ve got a good cable provider, you can check out Michael’s show on the Outdoor Channel, as part of their Wednesdays at the Range TV package, which also includes Shooting USA, and American Rifleman TV.

You can also find Michael online at his blog, or at Downrange TV.

I’ll be there, and a lot of other bloggers will be there.  If you’ve not already confirmed your attendance for the 2A Blog Bash, do it now.   One link for bloggers, and another for readers.

Evil Assault Weapons

When I was a young warthog, my brothers and I played with LEGO bricks all the time.  We would construct elaborate armies that would have at one another across time and space, pirates fighting modern cops, spacemen fighting knights, etc.

One of the biggest problems with our battles was a shortage of weapons pieces.  At the time LEGO only provided muskets and smoothbore pistol pieces, and some weird looking rayguns.  So our modern forces were actually quite outgunned.  However, in one of the coolest things I’ve seen, which is also sure to induce PSH in overprotective mommies, a company called BrickArms is producing LEGO sized AKs, Uzis, and other modern weapons for use with your LEGO troops.

BrickArms can help you build your private army with everything you need, from the superadvanced Colonial Marines’ Xeno Pulse Rifles to NATO’s G36 Assault Rifles to vintage German Rocket Propeller Grenade launchers, PPK pistols with Brausch silencers and Magnum revolvers. If your private army is a bunch of LEGO minifigs, that is.

It’s one of those things that I wish I had known about when I was a kid, because my LEGO warriors would have been loaded for bear, aliens, or whatever else came along.  I also suspect it’s a rather highly in demand item, since LEGO (the company) doesn’t seem interested in producing pulse rifles for their toys, which means that a third party will have to do the dirty work.

Be careful though, I’m pretty sure that said toys are probably banned in California.