We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Since you post this video a while back I’ve been thinking of a Nano as a summer pocket carry gun. I have yet to shoot one, though I have dry fired one at the LGS back to back with a Kahr CM9, I thought the trigger on the Kahr was MUCH better, but, still need to shoot both.
Maybe the next 90 Second Gun Review can be a CM/PM9?
Shelley really likes her PM9.
I own both the Nano and Shield and I too prefer the Shield, it just feels more like a real gun. I find my Shield a bit more accurate, but that’s probably due to my inadequacy with a long double-action pull. I used to have that skill and lost it. One thing you didn’t mention about the Nano is that I think it is perhaps the least snaggy of all the guns I’ve ever touched, there is nary a switch, lever, angle or really anything to catch in your pocket. As for the Nano being too slick, I cured that with Talon grip stickers and will probably order some for my Shield as well.
Seecamp 32….Great Pocket Gun !