The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
All that MIM makes the Baby Jesus cry. :p
That is actually one of the reasons to buy the Pro Series revolvers as opposed to the standard production line guns. The Pro Series revos don’t use as many MIM parts in the guts or so I’m told by S&W.
Also, whenever I say “guts” in reference to MIM, I think “same guts as sony!”
Damn, you finally shot it enough to fall apart!
I have never experienced a problem with MIM parts in a quality brand name firearm.
But then again, I worked at a place that fixed busted guns.
A good MIM part, in most applications, is just fine, although I’ll note that some pieces (for example, the trigger bar on the Walther PPK) are just not of MIM-friendly dimensions.
Also, the little ball-end of the trigger lever on newer Smith MIM lockwork looks like the head of a morningstar when you look at it under a loupe…
I have also had MIM failure issues.
Springfield 1911… MIM Disconnector snapped rendering the gun only marginally useful as a bludgeoning weapon.
Now it’s my personal S.O.P. to replace all MIM Parts with quality forged steel pieces as soon as is financially possible.
I think Grant Cunningham’s post on MIM was fairly enlightening.
Of course, the difficulty is how many non-gunsmiths are able to look at a MIM part and judge whether it was an appropriate choice by the manufacturer?
You BROKE it! BAD, gun nut. BAD!
Ok, so how on earth do you just look at a pile of parts like that and know which ones are MIM?
See the hollow back on the trigger and the flat face on the hammer?
You know what just frickin’ kills me?
Half the people who wonder “How did she look st that picture and know those are MIM parts?” are going to be arguing gun stuff with me on the internets tomorrow.
And people wonder why I’m all bitter and burnt-out about this shit…
Hey, not everyone is bright enough to recognize a walking, talking gun encyclopedia when they see one. As for the trigger and the hammer, I see what you’re talking about on the former. But not knowing what a non-MIM piece would look like, I don’t have a basis for comparison yet.
Sadly, I suspect my SKS and lever action .44 are the only things I own that don’t have at least some MIM pieces in there.
Sorry, I was just venting. 😮
If I had as many people insisting that I’m an idiot because I slaughtered their sacred cow, I’d be a little burnt out as well.
Fortunately, work tends to be the only thing that gets me burned out. It’s like it’s my fault that what they want to do is against the law. I’m not the EPA. I just get paid to attempt to understand their regs.
On a side note, I should be in Indy for a week in April for work. I’d love to meet up with you and Roberta while I’m there, if possible. I sent you an email around 7pm with the dates.
Now I just need to figure out if a VA CHP is recognized up there.
Ah! You took off the side plate! You don’t know what you may have released!
Well, I let all the juju out of my gun!
Have you taken apart and reassembled an old 4- or 5-screw Smith yet?
Once you do, you’ll be pissed at Smith for doing away with that 4th screw in front of the trigger guard, the one that let you just drop the cylinder stop plunger and spring in and out of the gun with no folding, spindling, mutilating, or cussing.
Great photo. After all this talk of 1911’s its nice to see a real “shoot every time” handgun.
Who did the action job?
So what did you do with the lock parts?
Comments are closed.