We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
I love how pretty much every single anti-gun thing on youtube gets votedown-bombed by pro-gun people.
Has Ruger responded to this?
So “fair use” only applies to pro-gun people?
The VPC is not claiming the material is theirs. The VPC is not using it commercially.
Personally, I may not like it, but I don’t see the problem.
No, I actually think that most of this is covered under fair use; but inflammatory headlines get more hits. The one part that’s borderline is the use of Ed’s image and words in that context, as that could be interpreted as intentionally damaging to his rep.
Oleg Volk had a similar thing happen a couple of years ago when the VPC used some of his photos in one of their attack bits.