We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Jumping the shark? not quite… their 500S&W raging bull that never saw the light of day was definitely rather “Fonzi-on-skis”.
I can see the use for less-than-lethal ammo, but, I see ZERO need for the Taurus Judge. Its just too much of a conversation piece and not enough of a useful platform.
Less than lethal ammo makes sense from an LE standpoint. It makes NO SENSE to make a less-lethal round for the Taurus Judge, though.
Less lethal Judge ammo? Wouldn’t that be … birdshot?
Can I have new 3″ ammo for my Saiga .410? k thx bai
‘Less lethal Judge ammo? Wouldn’t that be … birdshot?”
+1 I think of those Judge Commercials where the guy shoots a shoot-n-see target with a few loads of bird. Makes a big mess, but in the end the wadding will cause more deep-tissue damage.
But the Judge is LETHAL if you ever get attacked by rampaging watermelons. I’ve seen the video!
So, if the vegetables and fruits in your neck of the woods are organizing into wilding gangs, a Judge might just be the ticket.
Short of that, however, I can’t see it being really useful on anything much larger than a medium dog, or much farther away than 7 yards. I’ll stick with obsolete 1911. . .