You had to shoot the hostage in order to save him. Clearly they haven’t been influenced enough by Hollywood in USPSA and IDPA.
or you just be a terrorist and shoot all the “no-shoots’ and ignore all the shoots. 😀
Guilty bystanders. They’re not actually innocent, if they were, they wouldn’t be hangin’ out with no-good low-lifes like plate racks and Texas Stars. 🙂
They were shot by Sumdood!
Do you practice “hostage shots”? I work on a lot of partial targets/hostage shots…
Hey, in the end when you had a fleeing attacker in your sights you didn’t cap him.
That’s enough proof in the pudding for me!
Those other “no shoots” are just cardboard! Who cares about cardboard? I use it to start my woodstove!
Shoot based on their capabilities, not their intentions…
They call ’em that for a reason ;).
So how did you place overall?
I prefer to call them “collaborators”.
You had to shoot the hostage in order to save him. Clearly they haven’t been influenced enough by Hollywood in USPSA and IDPA.
or you just be a terrorist and shoot all the “no-shoots’ and ignore all the shoots. 😀
Guilty bystanders. They’re not actually innocent, if they were, they wouldn’t be hangin’ out with no-good low-lifes like plate racks and Texas Stars. 🙂
They were shot by Sumdood!
Do you practice “hostage shots”? I work on a lot of partial targets/hostage shots…
Hey, in the end when you had a fleeing attacker in your sights you didn’t cap him.
That’s enough proof in the pudding for me!
Those other “no shoots” are just cardboard! Who cares about cardboard? I use it to start my woodstove!
Shoot based on their capabilities, not their intentions…