We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Hopefully more effective than an AC/2, though.
Anything is more effective than an AC/2…
Seriously, you could (and I did) load a mech up with nothing but the standard MGs, and it was more effective than an AC/2. Talk about a whacky damage model.
The whole 3025-tech AC series was ineffective. Note that EVERY high-tech variant of the AC series is more efficient in every way than the 3025 ACs. The AC/2 is actually not the worst offender IMHO (it is at least light enough to put onto a scout mech as a primary weapon and threaten another mech in the same class – replace the Commando’s weapon fit with an AC/2 and send it after the Locust/Stinger/Wasp). Compare the AC/5 to the PPC and you understand why I vastly prefer the SHD-2K to the -2H, for example.
(Yes, I am geeky enough to be able to spot obscure variants of battlemechs).
Now, if you’re talking about the computer game series there’s additional factors 🙂