We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
It’s the same size as the P22???
That’s unfortunate. The P22 is a great plinker, but too large to carry for a .380 – I’ll stick with my P3AT, thanks…
It is roughly the same size as the P22, which if you ask me is a great size for a carry gun.
However, if you like ’em little, just wait until I post the .380 Sig has this year.
Caleb,
If I’m carrying a .380, it’s a pocket gun. If I’m putting something on my belt, I want it to be at least a 9mm.
Believe me, I want this to be something – Walther’s affiliated with S&W, and as a result a good number of their firearms are MA-compliant.
Ditto Sig. I will be waiting EAGERLY for the Sig 380 news…