Sebastian has a very good post up explaining the risk/reward conundrum that NRA faces in whether or not they should publicly oppose the Holder nomination.
He makes an excellent point in that NRA has to consider whether the risk of opposing the Holder nomination is worth the potential reward, especially if NRA should fail in its opposition to Holder. Personally, I’d rather see NRA worrying about upcoming gun control legislation than Eric Holder, because (like Sebastian) I agree that GOA, JPFO, bloggers, et al are the perfect weapons with which to fight the holder nomination.
As I’ve mentioned, I’ve already emailed all the Senators on the Judiciary Committee asking them to oppose the Holder nomination, and I encourage you to do the same.
