5 comments for “HK45 interview with Ken Hackathorn and Larry Vickers

  1. Mike
    January 14, 2011 at 14:13

    Interviews like this always make me want to hear the arguments from the designers on the other side who made the decisions these guys think were horrible.

    • January 15, 2011 at 06:13

      Mike — Having been the guy sitting across from the gun company executive decision-maker *many* times, trust me, few of them have any idea about what makes a pistol shootable or desirable for high-end users.

      Right before I left Beretta, the pistol product manager wanted to introduce an “Elite III” that would be an F model instead of a G (horrible idea motivated by manufacturing efficiency over functionality) and — I’m not making this up! — would have a “refined deeply blued finish” because he thought IDPA/USPSA shooters were more interested in how the gun looked than whether it would, for example, rust.

      • January 15, 2011 at 06:29

        On that note, the fact that they stopped making the Elite series period is also a “WTF”. I get they probably weren’t Beretta’s best seller, but I also doubt that the Glock 34 makes half the revenue in sales that G22s going to LEOs make, and Glock is still making that gun.

        • January 15, 2011 at 18:57

          FWIW, Ernest and I are already planning to corner a key person at Beretta during the SHOT Show to present an idea we have for an “Elite III” … probably won’t go anywhere, but we’ll see.

  2. Tam
    January 15, 2011 at 06:54

    Great piece!

Comments are closed.